<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why does capturing emotion have to be so hard?</title>
	<link>http://www.jorgengulliksen.com/blog/2007/05/07/why-does-capturing-emotion-have-to-be-so-hard/</link>
	<description>A no-name photojournalist's mind at war</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.jorgengulliksen.com/blog/2007/05/07/why-does-capturing-emotion-have-to-be-so-hard/#comment-496</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jorgengulliksen.com/blog/2007/05/07/why-does-capturing-emotion-have-to-be-so-hard/#comment-496</guid>
					<description>I love this shot!  I definitely think the tight frame works for the photo.  The Forbes photo is great, but I think you are more affected by the vast devastation than the emotion on their faces.  But I think this shot is more focused on the emotion in the face.  Her face makes the photo, so without the tight shot, I think the strong emotion would be lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this shot!  I definitely think the tight frame works for the photo.  The Forbes photo is great, but I think you are more affected by the vast devastation than the emotion on their faces.  But I think this shot is more focused on the emotion in the face.  Her face makes the photo, so without the tight shot, I think the strong emotion would be lost.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
